CommunityComments

Alan Garny's notes from a Paris meeting(with a french group).

  • CellML still just a concept, no tools
  • CMISS+CellML is a no go for them(who is them?)
  • looking forward to release of COR
  • will look at SBML first, then if it doesn't answer their needs they will look at CellML
  • reuse of components a welcome inclusion for 1.1, should have been in 1.0
  • were concerned about Physiome involvement
  • interest and confusion with ontologies
  • confusion over MOF/OMG
  • confusion over scraping of the reaction element
  • backwards compatibility concerns
  • interest in FieldML so long as it does not become CMISS specific